Honolulu Chapter

Neil deGrasse Tyson Says Chances of Intelligently Designed Universe “May Be Very High” – Evolution News & Views

April 29, 2016

“Whatever that being is, it very well might be able to create a simulation of a universe.”

“And if that’s the case, it is easy for me to imagine that everything in our lives is just the creation of some other entity for their entertainment,” Tyson says. “I’m saying, the day we learn that it is true, I will be the only one in the room saying, I’m not surprised.”

Source: Neil deGrasse Tyson Says Chances of Intelligently Designed Universe “May Be Very High” – Evolution News & Views

Stop Dismissing Feminine Values | Come Reason’s Apologetics Notes

April 29, 2016

“It strikes me as glaringly obvious that these efforts are using a masculine-tainted yardstick in measuring the worth of women. Alistair Roberts recently made the same point in his article “Why We Should Jettison the ‘Strong Female Character’.” Roberts focuses his complaint on today’s media fascination with portraying women protagonists as action heroes that basically out-man men. He writes:”

Source: Stop Dismissing Feminine Values | Come Reason’s Apologetics Notes

A Rape Survivor Speaks Out About Transgender Bathrooms

April 28, 2016

“Don’t they know anything about predators? Don’t they know the numbers? That out of every 100 rapes, only two rapists will spend so much as single day in jail while the other 98 walk free and hang out in our midst? Don’t they know that predators are known to intentionally seek out places where many of their preferred targets gather in groups? That perpetrators are addicts so committed to their fantasies they’ll stop at nothing to achieve them?”

Source: A Rape Survivor Speaks Out About Transgender Bathrooms

Haarsma’s Pykaryotes — Another Failed Evolution Simulation – Evolution News & Views

April 28, 2016

“Broadly speaking, however, there are three issues with his paper and model. First, he gives a false history for a key term, “interlocking complexity.” Second, the model assumes that co-option is easy, and bypasses simulating any actual co-option. Third, it allows even a random collection of proteins to be functional.”

Source: Haarsma’s Pykaryotes — Another Failed Evolution Simulation – Evolution News & Views

TEN Problems with the Canaanite Objection – Free Thinking Ministries

April 27, 2016

“Then they devoted all in the city to destruction, both men and women, young and old, oxen, sheep, and donkeys, with the edge of the sword” (Joshua 6:21). Why would God command the execution of all the Canaanites (along with the children) in the Old Testament? Many think this is one of the biggest objections … Continue reading TEN Problems with the Canaanite Objection

Source: TEN Problems with the Canaanite Objection – Free Thinking Ministries

Premiering in May in Seattle, Get Ready for Fire-Maker with Michael Denton; See the Trailer Now! – Evolution News & Views

April 25, 2016

“The documentary makes a two-pronged argument: that Earth is the only planet where fire can be harnessed, and that humans are the only creatures who are prepared to harness it.Denton notes the conspicuous coincidence that the Earth not only allows fire to be harnessed, but is filled with materials with capacities that can be unlocked by fire.”

Source: Premiering in May in Seattle, Get Ready for Fire-Maker with Michael Denton; See the Trailer Now! – Evolution News & Views

Why Evidence for God Argues for Only One God | Come Reason’s Apologetics Notes

April 25, 2016

Does the phrase “a cumulative case for God” really eliminate the possibility that the universe was created by one God and the morals by another? Couldn’t all of the arguments for God point to a pantheon of supernatural beings that may not ever exist anymore?

*Note: He accidentally wrote “Kalam Cosmological Argument” when he meant “Leibnizian Cosmological Argument”.

Source: Why Evidence for God Argues for Only One God | Come Reason’s Apologetics Notes

Darwin’s God: “Evolution” of Darwin’s Finches Tracked at Genetic Level

April 24, 2016

“This is not a story of random mutations luckily finding a new, improved, design that was then fixed in the population via natural selection. Preexisting genes influenced preexisting beak designs in preexisting finch species. And when the drought ceased the populations cycled back to their pre-drought designs. New designs were not created.But that is the science, and evolution never was about the science. Evolutionist’s on-going claims about the Galápagos finches are non scientific and, frankly, ridiculous. The finches truly are a classic icon of evolution. They don’t reveal a case of evolution in action, but rather evolutionary thought in action.”

Source: Darwin’s God: “Evolution” of Darwin’s Finches Tracked at Genetic Level

CS Lewis Quote:

April 24, 2016

“If a good God made the world why has it gone wrong? And for many years I simply refused to listen to the Christian answers to this question, because I kept on feeling “whatever you say and however clever your arguments are, isn’t it much simpler and easier to say that the world was not made by any intelligent power? Aren’t all your arguments simply a complicated attempt to avoid the obvious?” But then that threw me back into another difficulty.

My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I gotten this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such violent reaction against it? A man feels wet when he falls into water, because man is not a water animal: a fish would not feel wet. Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. But if I did that, then my argument against God collapsed too — for the argument depended on saying that the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my private fancies. Thus in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist — in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless — I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality — namely my idea of justice — was full of sense. Consequently, atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.”

— C.S. Lewis

Darwinism, the Meaninglessness of Life, and of Death – Evolution News & Views

April 23, 2016

“However, as I also explain in detail in my new book, many Darwinists are unable to really live in accord with their own philosophy. For instance, Coyne has stated that evolution “says that there is no special purpose for your life, because it is a naturalistic philosophy. We have no more extrinsic purpose than a squirrel or an armadillo.” But, in a different blog post, Coyne waxed indignant at those who have blamed mass shootings, such as those at Columbine, on Darwinism. (Coyne will likely be enraged that I explain Eric Harris’s Darwinian motivations in The Death of Humanity.) But why does Coyne care about these people, whose lives — according to his philosophy — have no meaning or purpose? He evidently recognizes that the lives of those teenagers gunned down at Columbine did have some point or purpose after all, greater than squirrels or armadillos.”

Source: Darwinism, the Meaninglessness of Life, and of Death – Evolution News & Views

What is the maximum number of trials evolution could have performed? | Dr. Kirk Durston

April 23, 2016

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too few, given the standard age of the universe!

“I have encountered many people who justify their belief that no intelligent Creator was needed, with the assumption that evolution has had a near-infinite number of trials to produce the full diversity of life. It is helpful, therefore, to figure out what the upper limit actually is, then we can be in a better position discuss whether it makes a Creator utterly unnecessary…”

Source: What is the maximum number of trials evolution could have performed? | Power to Change – Students

The “ring” of truth

April 21, 2016

“It is usual for one who invents a story which he wishes should be believed, to be careful that its several parts hang well together—to make its conclusions follow from its premises—and to show how they follow. He naturally considers that he shall be suspected unless his account is probable and consistent and he labors to provide against that suspicion. On the other hand, he who is telling the truth, is apt to state his facts and leave them to their fate; he speaks as one having authority, and cares not about the why or the wherefore, because it never occurs to him that such particulars are wanted to make his statement credible, and accordingly, if such particulars are discoverable at all, it is most commonly by inference, and incidentally.” – J.J. Blunt, “Undesigned Coincidences,” 276.

A Grave Matter: Richard Weikart on Humanity’s Life or Death Struggle – Evolution News & Views

April 20, 2016

“Weikart’s diagnosis is stark: civilization is ceasing to be civilized as it attempts to replace the value and intrinsic worth of each and every human being — traditionally conceived as imago Dei — with assorted “humanistic” alternatives that treat people as machines, automata, objects, and utilitarian means to ends of varying values with rights bestowed “on a sliding scale rather than being inalienable”…

Source: A Grave Matter: Richard Weikart on Humanity’s Life or Death Struggle – Evolution News & Views

Thoughts to ponder from James Tour | Uncommon Descent

April 19, 2016

“I’ve asked all of my colleagues – National Academy members, Nobel Prize winners -I sit with them in offices; nobody understands this. So if your professors say it’s all worked out, your teachers say it’s all worked out, they don’t know what they’re talking about. It is not worked out. You cannot just refer this to somebody else; they don’t know what they’re talking about.”

Source: Thoughts to ponder from James Tour | Uncommon Descent

A Christian Perspective on Homosexuality | Reasonable Faith

April 19, 2016

“To begin with, there is an almost compulsive promiscuity associated with homosexual behavior. 75% of homosexual men have more than 100 sexual partners during their lifetime. More than half of these partners are strangers. Only 8% of homosexual men and 7% of homosexual women ever have relationships lasting more than three years. Nobody knows the reason for this strange, obsessive promiscuity. It may be that homosexuals are trying to satisfy a deep psychological need by sexual encounters, and it just is not fulfilling. Male homosexuals average over 20 partners a year. According to Dr. Schmidt,

‘The number of homosexual men who experience anything like lifelong fidelity becomes, statistically speaking, almost meaningless. Promiscuity among homosexual men is not a mere stereotype, and it is not merely the majority experience—it is virtually the only experience. Lifelong faithfulness is almost non-existent in the homosexual experience.’

Associated with this compulsive promiscuity is widespread drug use by homosexuals to heighten their sexual experiences. Homosexuals in general are three times as likely to be problem drinkers as the general population. Studies show that 47% of male homosexuals have a history of alcohol abuse and 51% have a history of drug abuse. There is a direct correlation between the number of partners and the amount of drugs consumed.

Moreover, according to Schmidt, “There is overwhelming evidence that certain mental disorders occur with much higher frequency among homosexuals.” For example, 40% of homosexual men have a history of major depression. That compares with only 3% for men in general. Similarly 37% of female homosexuals have a history of depression. This leads in turn to heightened suicide rates. Homosexuals are three times as likely to contemplate suicide as the general population. In fact homosexual men have an attempted suicide rate six times that of heterosexual men, and homosexual women attempt suicide twice as often as heterosexual women. Nor are depression and suicide the only problems. Studies show that homosexuals are much more likely to be pedophiles than heterosexual men. Whatever the causes of these disorders, the fact remains that anyone contemplating a homosexual lifestyle should have no illusions about what he is getting into.”

Source: A Christian Perspective on Homosexuality | Reasonable Faith

Human Language: Noam Chomsky, Universal Grammar, and Natural Selection – Evolution News & Views

April 17, 2016

“In the early 1960s, in one of the landmark advances in 20th-century science, Noam Chomsky showed that all human languages share a deep invariant structure. Despite their very different “surface” grammars, they all share a deep set of syntactic rules and organizing principles. All have rules limiting sentence length and structure and all exhibit the phenomenon of recursion — the embedding of one sentence in another. Chomsky has postulated that this deep “universal grammar” is innate and is embedded somewhere in the neuronal circuitry of the human brain in a language organ.”

Source: Human Language: Noam Chomsky, Universal Grammar, and Natural Selection – Evolution News & Views

Why many believe what’s clearly false | Uncommon Descent

April 16, 2016

“– The belief that randomness produces information (central to Darwinism) is obviously false. It’s never been demonstrated because it can’t be. It is assumed.

It is assumed for the same reasons as the existence of a multiverse or a naturalist explanation for consciousness are assumed. And often spelled out: Any other approach raises the spectre of design.”

Source: Why many believe what’s clearly false | Uncommon Descent

Darwin’s God: Inherit the Wind: Evolution is an Illusion

April 15, 2016

“Just as the alien civilization produced an illusion that was precisely what Captain Pike would want to see, Inherit the Wind is precisely the Warfare Thesis illusion that evolutionists want to see. Flyover country is full of dangerous, anti-intellectual, fundamentalists who need to be set straight by the likes of Spencer Tracy.”

“11 For this reason God [j]will send upon them [k]a deluding influence so that they will believe [l]what is false, 12 in order that they all may be [m]judged who did not believe the truth, but [n]took pleasure in wickedness.” — 2 Thess. 2

Source: Darwin’s God: Inherit the Wind: Evolution is an Illusion

The waiting time problem in a model hominin population

April 13, 2016

The waiting time problem in a model hominin Population

Results:

Biologically realistic numerical simulations revealed that a population of this type required inordinately long waiting times to establish even the shortest nucleotide strings. To establish a string of two nucleotides required on average 84 million years. To establish a string of five nucleotides required on average 2 billion years. We found that waiting times were reduced by higher mutation rates, stronger fitness benefits, and larger population sizes. However, even using the most generous feasible parameters settings, the waiting time required to establish any specific nucleotide string within this type of population was consistently prohibitive.

Conclusion

We have used comprehensive numerical simulations to show that in populations of modest size (such as a hominin population), there is a serious waiting time problem that can constrain macroevolution. Our studies show that in such a population there is a significant waiting time problem even in terms of waiting for a specific point mutation to arise and be fixed (minimally, about 1.5 million years). We show that the waiting time problem becomes very severe when more than one mutation is required to establish a new function. On a practical level, the waiting time problem greatly inhibits the establishment of any new function that requires any string or set of specific linked co-dependent mutations. We show that the waiting times problem becomes more extreme as string length increases, as fitness benefit decreases, and as population size decreases. In a population of 10,000 the establishment of a string of just two specific co-dependent mutations tends to be extremely problematic (conservatively requiring an average waiting time of at least 84 million years). For nucleotide strings of moderate length (eight or above), waiting times will typically exceed the estimated age of the universe – even when using highly favorable settings. Many levels of evidence support our conclusions, including the results of virtually all the other researchers who have looked at the waiting time problem in the context of establsihing specific sequences in specific genomic locations within a small hominin-type population. In small populations the waiting time problem appears to be profound, and deserves very careful examination. To the extent that waiting time is a serious problem for classic neo-Darwinian theory, it is only reasonable that we begin to examine alternative models [39, 40] regarding how biological information arises.

Source: The waiting time problem in a model hominin population

Probability Mistakes Darwinists Make – Evolution News & Views

April 9, 2016

“Nonetheless, scientific literature reveals an unshakable belief that evolution can do the wildest, most improbable things tens of thousands of times over. Consequently, I believe Darwinism has become a religion, specifically a modern form of pantheism, where nature performs thousands of miracles — none of which can be reproduced in a lab. On the other hand, if we apply a scientific method to detect intelligent design discussed here, we see that 433 bits of information is a strong marker of an intelligent origin. This test for intelligent design reveals the most rational position to take is that the genomes of life contain digital information from an intelligent source.”

Source: Probability Mistakes Darwinists Make – Evolution News & Views

End of fundamental physics in view? | Peter Woit – Uncommon Descent

April 9, 2016

“I’d make the point that there’s no way to know what the limits will be to human understanding of physical laws. It has however become all too clear what the danger is of what will happen when we reach those limits. Instead of prominent theorists frankly admitting “we don’t know”, there will be an attempt to sell the story to the public that theorists have a wonderful, successful theory which describes everything, which sadly has the unfortunate feature of not making any falsifiable predictions. The string landscape/multiverse scenario now is being very aggressively sold as exactly this kind of endpoint to physics, to a large degree by people unwilling to admit the failure of string theory-based unification. There’s a very real danger that this will enter the textbooks, and that we will in our lifetimes see the end of fundamental physics as a human endeavor. The limit we will have hit will be due not to the nature of our minds, but instead the nature of our sociology.”

Source: End of fundamental physics in view? | Uncommon Descent

In Atheists We Distrust – Scientific American

April 8, 2016

“Atheists are one of the most disliked groups in America. Only 45 percent of Americans say they would vote for a qualified atheist presidential candidate, and atheists are rated as the least desirable group for a potential son-in-law or daughter-in-law to belong to. Will Gervais at the University of British Columbia recently published a set of studies looking at why atheists are so disliked. His conclusion: It comes down to trust.”

Source: In Atheists We Distrust – Scientific American

“Question the Answer” — in Every Field but Evolution – Evolution News & Views

April 8, 2016

“Or as Ivan Oransky at Retraction Watch told Quartz, “If you never find mistakes, or failures to reproduce in your field, you’re probably not asking the right questions.”And they’re correct, of course. But who will tell the evolutionists? Scientists and science teachers alike are expected to uphold allegiance to neo-Darwinism.”

Source: “Question the Answer” — in Every Field but Evolution – Evolution News & Views

Galileo’s rep is mostly hype? | Uncommon Descent

April 7, 2016

“Galileo’s rise to immortality starts at the end of the 18th century. In this period, scientific biography started to become popular, and Galileo became a favourite subject, largely because of his persecution by the Catholic Church. This effect was immensely magnified by the largely mythical war between science and religion in the late 19th century, waged by two US-based scientist-historians, John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White.”

Source: Galileo’s rep is mostly hype? | Uncommon Descent

Atheist author Dominic Johnson makes argument for religion – The Spirit of Things – ABC Radio National (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

April 6, 2016

“Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling, who was responsible for one of the biggest accounting frauds in history, counted Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene as his favourite book and main source of inspiration.”

Source: Atheist author Dominic Johnson makes argument for religion – The Spirit of Things – ABC Radio National (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

THE GENESIS DEBATE: How Old is the Earth? | Free Thinking Ministries

April 6, 2016

One of the greatest debates behind church doors is regarding the first book of the Bible. Christians are split regarding what the author’s original intent of the first three chapters of Genesis really was. Are these “creation days” supposed to be taken literally? In the book, “The Genesis Debate: Three Views on the days of Creation,” … Continue reading THE GENESIS DEBATE: How Old is the Earth?

Source: THE GENESIS DEBATE: How Old is the Earth? | Free Thinking Ministries

A Response To Bart Ehrman: Craig Evans On How God Became Jesus – Scott M. Sullivan

April 5, 2016

Dr. Craig Evans’ book “How God became Jesus” gives an intelligent rebuttal to Dr. Bart Ehrman’s book “How Jesus Became God” which states that Jesus is not divine.Dr. Craig Evans strongly disagrees with the evidences that Dr. Ehrman gives. In the Jewish setting, you don’t expect people to equate themselves with God Jesus did.

Source: A Response To Bart Ehrman: Craig Evans On How God Became Jesus – Scott M. Sullivan

Baroque Botany: Elaborate but Functional – Evolution News & Views

April 5, 2016

“The film explores numerous examples that are “completely outside the domain of natural selection” because they emerge without ancestors, are gratuitously complex, and would have had no adaptive value even if ancestors were known. A good example is flowering plants.

The origin of angiosperms is frequently called “Darwin’s abominable mystery” because the rise and diversification of flowering plants in the fossil record is so sudden.”

Source: Baroque Botany: Elaborate but Functional – Evolution News & Views

Darwin’s God: Warfare Thesis Failure Leaves Evolution Desperate For Canards – Dr. Cornelius Hunter

April 5, 2016

“That “number” Tyson referred to was not the number of backwoods fideists, but rather the number of scientists, who reject evolution. The greatest minds in history didn’t buy it and a non trivial percentage of today’s scientists also aren’t quite sure that astronomical entropy barriers have repeatedly been climbed an astronomical number of times by, err, random chance events.”

Source: Darwin’s God: Warfare Thesis Failure Leaves Evolution Desperate For Canards

Magnificent Video

April 3, 2016

A stunning video glorifying God’s creation.

People who say “God doesn’t speak” are deaf to the language of beauty:

Source: Magnificent